Saturday, March 31, 2007

Al-Ahram Nails The Arab Leaders Cold ...

In an editorial from the Egyptian weekly Al-Ahram, the self-serving nature of the world's Middle Eastern Arab leaders are exposed.

Once again, with many more pressing problems, the leaders of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Co. are trying to save face in the Arab word (and their own skins) by massively refocusing all efforts on "The Peace Process." Nothing new here but it's just another chance to note how the Arab leaders have manipulated the Israeli/Palestinian crisis for their own gain for the past fifty years and will continue to do so however it serves their own best interests.

What a pathetic group of losers. Their greed and self-serving mismanagement of wealth and resources is the reason for the worldwide Islamic threat we all face. If they shared the wealth, focused on the present and offered their people hope these same killers we see todaywould be spending their weekends at their local mall buying mocca frapachinos and Gap jeans instead of blowing people up.


Taking the initiative

In Riyadh for the Arab summit
, Dina Ezzat finds Arab delegates all but obsessed with one issue: the Arab peace initiative

This week in the Saudi capital for the annual Arab summit -- and indeed in the lead-up to the Riyadh meetings -- the Arab peace initiative was the uncontested focus of attention. This despite crucial political and security challenges facing the Arab world in Iraq, Lebanon, Somalia and Darfur, fears of a US strike against Iran, alienation of most Arab Maghreb countries from the rest of the Arab world, and many miscellaneous inter-Arab differences.

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/838/fr2.htm

Letter from the Editor ...

I've been off for a while. The overall horrific, partisan news coverage here in the United States was beginning to nauseate me and I realized I needed a time out. You can really O.D. on it. So I took a few weeks to zero in on other business. Today , I am still disgusted but feel compelled to check in with new thoughts generated by a bit of fresh perspective.

Here we go:

1. No one here really knows what is going on inside Iran's dictatorship. However, common sense dictates that they cannot be happy about worldwide sanctions, terrible publicity and multiple U.S. aircraft carriers on their door steps. Iran obviously knows from a military standpoint the U.S. can have them for lunch. This is despite all the left wing media claims of Iran becoming a new force to be reckoned with in the Middle East. Compared to whom, the Emirate States? Realizing this, their only hope is to manipulate the anti-U.S. media and hope they continue to help push their agenda. Maybe Pelosi visits the mullahs next.

2. Europe is being extremely embarrassed by their own impotence. It is clear that the E.U. can basically do nothing to Iran and are completely relying on the U.S. for protection while they continue to slam them, just in case ...

3. The U.S. Congress and the Left are at war with President Bush. They are doing everything within their power to insure the balance of his presidency will fail. It is all political and all based on the 08 election. They will stop at nothing to try and embarrass him and render him impotent to the world. They will sacrifice the war for that purpose. And it is all going to backfire on them for several reasons.

Their actions are transparent and self-servings. They are also cowardly and hypothetical. Instead of standing their ground and trying to push for immediate withdrawal, they are hedging, showing this is political and not ideological. If they had the guts to stand their ground, even thought I disagree with them, I would respect them. However, they remain purely politically motivated and it is disgusting.

Bush will veto their proposal, despite the constant media bombardment the war is going much better and this will blow up in Democratic faces. Bush will rise like a Phoenix.

4. The left is scared to death of Giuliani. Just wait until he gets out there and represents himself on the circuit. A far better speaker than Bush, a real McCoy, he will expose them as the partisan clowns they are. They are in trouble with Ruby.

5. Man isn't it fun to see Gingrich slap Colmes all over his own program each weak. When Colmes tries his childish nonsense, Newt destroys him with facts and Colmes is exposed like all liberals, living in a vacuum.

6. There may be no bigger as-hole in the history of broadcast television than Keith Olbermann.

Talk about an insecure, smug, transparent, mean spirited fool. He spends 75% of every one of his MSNBC broadcasts (always in last place) ripping the Bush administration.

It is so tasteless. His motives so obvious it's pathetic. He and his sidekick Richard Wolff ( a dead ringer for Kazu from The Flintstones) of super far left Newsday magazine are so envious of Bill O'Reily and Fox news that they somehow manage to incorporate them into almost every broadcast. Olbermann clearly has O'Reily envy. To his credit O'Reily, tremendously ahead in the head to head ratings, never even acknowledges Olbermann's existence, something that must drive this Classic Sport's dropout crazy. The funniest thing I hear so far this year was Olbermann criticizing Fox of biased broadcasting. Is it any wonder why he is always dead last in the ratings?

MORE TO COME ...

4.

NY Post Slaps Pelosi as Transparent Fool

Isn't it nice that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi takes it upon herself to take a Middle East tour that will include a visit with Syrian leader Bashar Assad? This is despite the fact that the White House has strongly stressed their displeasure over this matter. Despite the fact that Syria is responsible for the deaths of U.S. soldiers in Iraq.

What is Perlosi's objective in such a defiant gesture? She obviously realizes that the photo op will be broadcast world, especially in the Arab world as a gesture of undercutting the president. It shows how politically naive she is. This will ultimately blow up huge in both her and the democratic parties face.

I can't wait.

MISS SYRIA
WHITE HOUSE SLAMS PELOSI TERROR TRIP
By IAN BISHOP, The New York Post

March 31, 2007 -- WASHINGTON - The White House yesterday sharply condemned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for making a date with a terrorist - blasting her trip to Syria and possible "tea" with its dictator, Bashar Assad, calling it a "really bad idea."

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03312007/news/nationalnews/miss_syria_nationalnews_ian_bishop.htm

Washington Post's Krauthammer: Dem's getting it wrong again

Charles Krauthammer spells out the clear, obvious loop holes and flat out inexperience in the Democratic strategies for the Middle East.

Afghanistan Isn't a Reason
Bad Democratic reasoning.
By Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post

Our bill calls for the redeployment of U.S. troops out of Iraq so that we can focus more fully on the real war on terror, which is in Afghanistan.
— Speaker Nancy Pelosi, March 8

The Senate and the House have both passed bills for ending the Iraq war, or at least liquidating the American involvement in it. The resolutions, approved by the barest majorities, were underpinned by one unmistakable theme: wrong war, wrong place, distracting us from the real war that is elsewhere.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NzRlYzU4NGZmNTk0MmJmMGEyZjI1ZjgwNWRjZjRkZmM=

Monsters by 449 Quentin

Monsters
By 449 Quentin , 3/30/07

After work on Friday March 9, 2007 I sat in my car enjoying a chicken roll and a slice of pizza while I checked out the movie reviews for the weekend. I selected a Korean import called “The Host” . The film got excellent reviews as compared to the awful stuff Hollywood has been churning out, so I went to see it.

The reviews did not lie. The film was well made and a thoroughly enjoyable experience. Unfortunately along with the great flick I had to endure a cultural brainwashing from the Liberal thought police.

The story is a Korean version of the monster that ate Tokyo. Our boy is no Godzilla just a bus size Guppy with legs and a garbage disposal type mouth. His little legs propel him right out of the water so that he can run you down. Guppy boy is fantastic but its the people in the movie that get to your heart. They are an everyman kind of family that runs a snack stand down by the river the Mega guppy with Nikes lives in. All five of them have terrific character development. We get a cute but heroic schoolgirl, Her dimwitted but honorable dad, an aunt and uncle out of real life as apposed to central casting. This is topped off by a grandpa who stoically does the right thing regardless of the odds.

It’s the politics behind the film that are really monstrous. You see Mega Guppy got to grow as big and ornery as he did because a United States Military scientist ordered a sweet as pie Korean scientist to empty a couple of thousand bottles of lethal chemicals into a sink. Why? Well because the bottles were dusty and the Dick Chaney look alike American has a thing about dusty bottles along with other Hitler style traits. Of course the drain leads to the river and well you get it.

Here is where the left shines. Bong Joon-ho the Korean who wrote and directed the film is in sync with John Anderson who wrote the review that I read in Long Island Newsday. Newsday is not in a perfect position to pontificate on good and evil because they were involved recently in faking their circulation which is a big no, no in media land. Mr. Johnson calls the flick a socio-political critique that shines a light on U.S. intervention/neglect in Korean affairs. Uncle Sam is the villain of choice in liberal circles.

Although to my dim witted Right Wing way of thought perhaps the Director and the Movie Critic should look a bit further north along the Korean peninsula if they want to embellish fiction with fact. Perhaps they should check out one Kim Jong il Il who has all the attributes of a real villain. As opposed to the United States which brought wealth and freedom to the south with a generous payment of American blood. Kim has brought the north, famine, ignorance and poverty on a world class scale. He also dabbles in counter fitting dollars, selling drugs and spreading weapons to the highest bidder. But don’t take my word for it, hang out at the borders and check who is sneaking in or out of which country.

The south is churning out television sets, cars and ships while the north is sifting through garbage dumps looking for a snack. But then isn’t that the way Liberals all over the world see reality. According to them the axis of evil consist of George Bush, Dick Cheney and the Republican party. The Liberal media has just about destroyed all three.

Even in the world of fiction and film the Americans are the evil hand behind the horrors that confront the world. One would think that as the Lib’s take over the world that perhaps they should ponder this. After the last spade full of earth is tossed on the coffin containing Bush, Chaney and the Republican party, the Lib’s will have inherited the earth. They will have to deal with what they have been denying while they vented their spleen on George W and company. They will have to confront the people who blow up trains, planes and buses. They will have to deal with Radical Islam. It will be their problem to see that everybody has a full tank of gas in their car and a nice warm house to read The New York Times in. Darfur will still be there and the Mexican border will still have a welcome sign hanging over a hole in the barb wire . The electorate in the heart land will look at them if Cleveland goes up in a puff of smoke. They will get the phone call in the middle of the night if everybody in Dallas gets a real strange and real lethal rash.

The world will still be there even though George W is gone and it ain’t going to be a pretty place. Then it will all be up to Ted Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi and they will wish that all they had to worry about would be a guppy on steroids with a nasty attitude.

National Review's Victor Davis Hanson on a Clearly Weak Europe

Professor Hanson spells out Europe's self-created impotency now that the Iranians are rubbing it in their faces.

March 30, 2007

Houses of Straw
The EU’s delusions about the sufficiency of “soft” power are embarrassingly revealed.
by Victor Davis Hanson
National Review Online

It’s completely outrageous for any nation to go out and arrest the servicemen of another nation in waters that don’t belong to them.” So spoke Admiral Sir Alan West, former First Sea Lord of the Royal Navy, concerning the present Anglo-Iranian crisis over captured British soldiers. But if the attack was “outrageous,” it was apparently not quite outrageous enough for anything to have been done about it yet.

http://victorhanson.com/

Iran's Nuclear Motives

Nuclear Motives
Understanding why Iran took British hostages.
By Mario Loyola

There’s no denying it. Iran’s capture of 15 British hostages was a stroke of cunning — and a brilliant one at that. The mullahs were in a pickle. They had decided to do two things which were going to push Washington closer to military action. They needed a diversion or a smokescreen some way to make the Bush administration blink. And so far, it has worked.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MWI3NDc1MGI3YjYyYzllODZiNzUwZGZiNmNiNDJhNDQ=

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Hizbullah Rep on Iranian Television ...

Hizbullah’s representative in Iran, Abdallah Safialdeen: Hizbullah Will Not Need a Large-Scale War. It Will Be Able to Walk into Palestine, Once the Americans Leave Iraq .....

Following are excerpts from an address by Abdallah Safialdeen, Hizbullah’s representative in Iran, which aired on Channel 4, Iranian TV, on March 4, 2007.

http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1397

Al - Ahram Posts Some Political Cartoons ...

Al-Ahram, Eqypts leading newspaper published with goverment approval, showcases some of their favorite political cartoons of the week.....

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/835/cartoon.htm

Israeli Perspective on the Saudi Peace "Order" ..

Mar. 13, 2007 21:49 Updated Mar. 14, 2007 22:16
What's missing from the Saudi initiative
By
SHLOMO AVINERI

One key element is missing from the Saudi initiative and from the March 2002 Beirut declaration of the Arab League - negotiations. In the flurry of current activity surrounding the Beirut declaration, this aspect has been almost totally overlooked.

What did the Beirut declaration stipulate? It "called upon Israel to affirm" three points: full and unequivocal withdrawal from all the occupied territories; achieving a "just solution" to the Palestinian refugee problem in accordance with UN General Assembly Resolution 194; and acceptance of an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza with East Jerusalem as its capital.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173700694809&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Brzezinski on the Future...

A Manifesto For the Next President

By
David IgnatiusWednesday, March 14, 2007

Zbigniew Brzezinski has written a new book that might be a foreign policy manifesto for
Barack Obama. Its message is that America can recover from what Brzezinski calls the "catastrophic" mistakes of the Bush administration, but only if the next president makes a clean break from those policies and aligns the country with a world in transformation.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/13/AR2007031301504.html

Ralph Peters on Putin

VLAD'S NEW BAD
PUTIN MAKES MORE ENEMIES
Ralph Peters, The New York Post

March 14, 2007 -- An old joke runs that even paranoids have enemies. But what can we make of the quasi-dictator of a middleweight state who insists on making enemies of those who'd hoped to be his country's friends?

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03142007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/vlads_new_bad_opedcolumnists_ralph_peters.htm

Keith Olbermann and MSNBC - Distrubing and Nasty

It is interesting to note that we may be entering the first presidential election of the electronic media age where candidates clearly have major television networks working for them. In addition, the candidates themselves simply intend to focus as much of their campaigning as possible directly to the same distribution networks. It is disturbing, but it is happening.

John Edwards pulling out of the Fox interview last week is a perfect example. Another is that no one has seen Obama really anywhere that is not scripted. He is truly Redford in "The Candidate." Most disturbing of all to me, is the night in, night out campaign by MSNBC and it's truly nasty, insecure, smug host Keith Olbermann. You cannot pick any weeknight where he is not opening his show bashing the Bush administration. Each evening he teams up with his supporting cast of mutants and misfits (Richard Wolfee of Newsweek who resembles in face and mannerisms of Kazu from the Flintstones stands out ) and works his hardest to maximize any angle possible in the hope that one of his plights will pick up steam enough to get him out of his perennial slot in third place (out of three). It is pathetic.

(More to come)

Blair Facing Rebellion over Defense Budget

I am really not 100% up to date on what British spend on its military, but it appears that a serious majority does not want to continue in the fashion that has kept Britain somewhat of a world power. I don't know if they feel spending might upset other nations they would rather pacify but I hope they understand that as the world changes, it does not only do so for Britain. The United States cannot be Europe's body guard forever. No one is telling them what to do. I simply say if they believe that the United States will front all bills in the future so kids can slam our president over beers in a pub, they are misleading themselves.

PM faces nuclear vote rebellion
BBC News, 03/14/07

Tony Blair may face his biggest Commons rebellion since the start of the Iraq war when MPs vote on plans to renew the UK's Trident nuclear weapons system. MPs will debate the £20bn plan to replace the submarines which carry the Trident missiles.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6448173.stm

Islamic Militants in Pakistan Bomb Targets Close to Home

Now it gets real hairy. Islamic terrorists are taking the fight directly to Pakistan, positioning it as retaliation for Afghanistan and Musharf will have to deal with a political minefield. Long believed to be the weakest link based on huge anti-American sentiment, Pakistan and its nuclear weapons may literally be a strongman's heartbeat away from fanatical control. Where the army's loyalty lies remain to be seen. It is some serious sh-t and I really hope Musarf and gang stop hedging and squash this uprising fast. It cannot gain momentum or we're all in for trouble that makes a shaky stock market look like a birthday party.

By CARLOTTA GALL

Published: March 14, 2007
PESHAWAR, Pakistan — Along the Afghan border, not far from this northwestern city, Islamic militants have used a firm foothold over the past year to train and dispatch suicide bombers against American and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/14/world/asia/14pakistan.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Ralph Peters sets it Straight ...

Ralph Peters slams home the manipulative actions of far-left media like The New York Slimes in an article from today's New York Post ... I never thought I'd live to see the day I went to the Post over the Times for fair news coverage but it's today!

VIVA BUSH
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE PRESIDENT'S LATIN AMERICA TRIP
Ralph Peters, The New York Post

March 11, 2007 -- AS our president arrived in Brazil last week, the U.S. media made it sound as if Latin America had erupted in flames. TV news featured flying tear-gas canisters; a typical newspaper headline read, "Angry Crowds Rally Against President in Brazil."
Message: Bush is hated. He's ruined our relations with the hemisphere. Nobody loves us anymore - and it's all his fault.

Blame America Venezuela Style: By The New York Slimes ...

It just would not be Sunday (actually any day's edition) if the New York Times did not run one article or another slamming the Bush Administration. The fact that they do it so consistently and indiscriminately only adds to the transparent nature of their carefully scripted agenda.

Today, rather than report on positive steps being taken on the president's trip to South and Central America, the New York Times chooses to run an article by a Chavez plant that reads like a cross between a failed fairy tale and a child's sob story. All sculpted around the message "Bad Bush, No Amigo." It's pathetic.

The author starts with the author's idealized childhood vision of America when as a little boy, he holds his illustrated (Monroe photos?) copy of a John F. Kennedy bio and dreaming of great things yet to come. The author, who just so happens to be Venezuelan (as in Chavez), goes on to say that today's South America is a mess and it turned out that way because they were particularly ignored by the Bush administration following 9-11. With such damage done, what hope is there for a future?

Let's forget that this is a Chavez propaganda piece that the slime balls from the New York Times selected to print in the largest selling Sunday addition. That being established, has it occurred to the author that perhaps the United States has been a little busy since 9/11/01? I am struck by so much of the world feeling that it is owed something by the United States. Where are the author's complaints about a lack of support from Europe, Canada, Russia, India or the newly emerged giant China? Nowhere, just blaming the U.S. The most honest thing he says in the whole article is that anti-American sentiment always existed, even in his idealistic, good old days and that his father, a doctor, never had a job.

This is the sort of cr-p that The New York Slimes chooses to print as President Bush is on a tour of South America to promote alliance to utilize ethanol to replace oil dependency over time.

Kind of makes you want to vomit, doesn't it?
Op-Ed Contributor
On the Road With Bush and Chávez
By FERNANDO BÁEZ
Published: March 11, 2007
Caracas, Venezuela

WHEN I was a little boy in San Félix de Guayana, a Venezuelan village on the banks of the Orinoco, the doctors who worked in the poorest communities were from the United States. My father, an honest lawyer who was unemployed his entire life, felt a genuine sense of pride in the United States, and in time, he transmitted this pride to me. One of the first books he ever gave me, covered in an olive-green dust jacket and stamped with gold-foil letters, was an illustrated biography of John F. Kennedy, his personal hero.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/11/opinion/11baez.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Aljazeera reports First Direct Talks between U.S. and Iran

It appears to be official. At a conference today in Iraq to attempt to improve stability, Aljazeera News Service has announced that U.S. representatives had their first publicly acknowledged dialogue with Iranian representatives since 1979.

Hopefully for the world many more will come. If positioned correctly, both sides offer the other the best opportunity for peace in the region.

Iraq warns neighbours to stay out

Iraq's prime minister has urged regional powers, including Iran and Syria, not to use the country as a proxy battleground.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/DE29B631-6219-4E92-9A19-4807E57B7520.htm

449 Quentin and The Kid...

2007-P Geopolitics 101

The kid was 23 and I was 65, so it was surprising that we had as much in common as we did. We could talk easily and effortlessly. We did a little business together and that was our initial connection. But soon we developed a friendship that transcended the decades. There was so much going on in the world and we both enjoyed talking about it.

Topics were available in abundance and we jumped with ease from North Korea to Iraq and on to Iran. We also delved into American history and Western culture. The kid was brilliant beyond his years and I had to strain myself to my intellectual limit to keep up with him. This was new terrain for me, usually I had to wait for others to catch up to me. The thing was that he was good at analyzing nuances. Things that I hadn’t noticed despite my prodigious reading. If I picked up a new book on terrorism, World War 2 or Islamic History he had already read it and his critique always had an incisive new slant that I had not even considered.

The kid was also precocious at business and I could sense that soon he would leave me in the dust in that area. Almost without realizing it I was verging on becoming his acolyte. I could see myself sitting at his feet asking about the meaning of life as well as where to buy the best cigars. The way things were going soon I would be asking him for personal advice and I didn’t want to go there. Collecting Social Security and having a 23 year old kid for a mentor all in one year was a bit to much for my aging and decaying ego to contend with.

The kid was becoming too big of an entity for me to handle. This was amazing in and of itself, since I had been dealing with my impending appointment with the grim reaper and had aced that one. Besides I sensed that to him I was becoming a bit of a bore and a predictable one at that. Soon he and all of the talks that I cherished would be gone. I could take that to the bank. I knew that I had better refine my questions because the minutes were dwindling fast. So I decided to cut to the heart of the matter. It was time to stop micromanaging Iraq or Iran and to go for the gold. To throw one dead center into the heart of the strike zone and to see how far he could hit it.

So I looked him dead in the eye. My aging failing eye directly into his eye vibrant with wisdom and youth.
“We have been talking about the titanic struggle Islam has been waging with the west”, I said.
“You mean the little thousand year plus tea party”, he quipped.
“The very same”, I answered.
“We are going to lose”, He said.
“Can’t you even wait for me to ask the question”, I said.
“You know you are getting a bit predictable”, he said.

I felt like telling him that he was an intellectual punk and that I was doing serious geopolitical analysis while his grandmother was breathing heavy with his grandfather. But the deck was stacked in that debate ,so I stifled my anger. “Are you saying that with all of our sea power, air power and nuclear weapons we are going to lose our civilization to a pack of street thugs”, I said.
“Exactly”, the little bastard replied smugly. Then he went on almost in a whisper, ”did you ever consider where the foundation that supports Wall Street, The Mississippi River and Hollywood came from?

“ What do you mean”, I asked.
“ The supports were forged at places like Bunker Hill, Gettysburg and Iowa Jima”, he continued
“ I understand that”, I said ,but what’s your point.
“I have been on college campuses all over the country”, he went on.
“And your point is“? I replied.
“It’s just that I mingle and I talk constantly with my generation”, he said.
“And you do not“.
“Of course I do not”, I said, “your 23 and I’m 65”.
“Precisely”, he continued, “they’re my peers not yours”.
“What is your conclusion”, I asked.
“I’ll be leaving America within five years”, he answered. “The future is elsewhere”.
“With all of our military might”, I said.
“In the final equation all of our wealth and our weaponry will not save us’, he went on.
“Because as I said I know my generation. They worship at the shrine of negotiation. They’re too soft and to used to the easy road. They will not fight, it’s as simple as that”.
I walked away and I knew that I would never see the kid again. I also knew that yet again he had nailed it.

Hillary's in Big Trouble...

I know it is very early in the game, but my gut tells me Hillary Clinton is not going to win the Democratic nomination. Everything I see tells me that Barack Obama is going to grow and improve as a candidate by the week and by the time it comes to meet head to head he will blow past her.

Obama is extremely bright and confident. He is a far better speaker. He comes across much more legitimate and confident. To my eyes Hillary is showing cracks already. Unless Obama falls hard due to an unforeseen something, I think he will surprise many and take it.

Putin and Russia: What is Going On?

The more I read about Putin's iron-fisted approach to ruling Russia, the less it alarms me.

I like to consider myself a pragmatist. I try to do as much research as I can (a constantly evolving process) and form beliefs based on the best quantitative analysis of which I am capable. It's not a perfect process and it is subject to change. However, it has helped me get by thus far.

America's recent experiences in Iraq and the Middle East as a whole have taught me a great deal. Each region of the world is steeped in it's own personal histories, rivalries and customs. No outsider can simply come in and impose their beliefs no matter how genuine their intentions.

I have also learned that there is no such thing as allies. That is a term best associated with WWII propaganda films. Then as now, what we have are alliances. Each country, to the best of it's abilities, is out for it's own best interest. There is not one nation in the world that puts another countries best interests before it's own. This brings me back to Mr. Putin's Russia.

Putin is a streamlined, modernized morph from the Cold War Era. He was spawned from the lions of the old KGB. He was never a fan of how the Cold War played out, of Yeltsin's booze-soaked attempt at democracy (western style) or of riding shotgun to Dubya. I doubt he saw a soul mate looking into Bush's eyes during that famous, often referenced meeting. My guess is he felt more like Stalin did after first meeting Truman after Roosevelt's death. (Not impressed to say the least).

Putin never believed that his once great nation deserved to lose superpower status. He had a point - as any nation able to blow up the planet 100 times is not second rate. To him, the former Soviet Union was in remission and was he was not happy about how it was treated by the West during its hiatus.

Over the past few years Putin has successfully managed to revamp and pump Russia back up to main-player status. Russia is riding a resurgence based upon energy wealth and Putin's iron-fisted management style. The Russian people appear to be firmly behind him. They were miserable in the abyss they found themselves in the 1990's. It is clear they are comfortable with Putin's leadership style, preferring it to the anarchy that came to their country along with American-style democracy.

I am happy to see a resurgent Russia much like I am happy to see an emerging China. The blow back, both domestic and international, to America as sole superpower is too great. In fits of rage and jealously the world blames us for all their problems. At home we have become incredibly spoiled and soft. We live with a sense of entitlement comprised of delusional priorities that while idealistic, wouldn't cut it in a Darwinist society.

Let the world see Russian justice, let them see Chinese justice. Let them continue to see Middle Eastern justice. Let everyone see on a comparative basis exactly how business is conducted in the real world so when the Zabar's crowd and the New York Times editors sit down over their nine course high priced lunches, they may have something realistic to gauge their bit-hing about.

Below you will find yet another article that details Putin's mafia-style management. Maybe we should turn Iraq over to him. He appears to play a game of hardball they might understand over there.

Breaking Putin's Cordon
By Masha Lipman
Saturday, March 10, 2007; Page A19

The Kremlin has been sending persistent signals that autonomous political activism will not be tolerated. As a result, political action on the streets has become highly risky in Russia, and those venturing to participate in events unwelcome by the government should be prepared to get in trouble.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030901750.html

New York Times out to Destroy a Presidency ...

You might as well call them "The New York Slimes." Based on their coverage of President Bush's tour of South America there can be no doubt that the formerly great news institution is now an agenda-driven editorial machine using its significant influence for self-motivated purposes.

There is nothing fair and balanced about the articles The New York Times has written on this very important trip. Instead of giving recognition to an American president for finally taking steps to start a movement away from oil dependency, they choose to focus on protesters promoted by regional thug, strongman and arch anti-America advocate Hugo Chavez.

The editors of The New York Times have declared open warfare on the Bush administration and will continue to do so for the balance of his term. They arrogantly use their reach to push a far-left agenda to insure a democrat wins the office of presidency in 08. It is a terrible misuse of influence and it is important that it be memorialized.

Several major news agencies have joined the New York Times in this campaign. NBC News, MSNBC and Newsweek magazine all share the same agenda. It is more important than ever to track this behavior. The presidential primary season has been revamped. Primaries are scheduled earlier and closer together than ever before. Tons of money must be raised much faster in order for candidates to have a shot for contending. News coverage will have a major influence on determining who will be able to emerge as front runners.

I want to stress that this site and editor are neither Republicans nor Democrats. We are moderates that do not agree with the extreme 20% of either party. Our coverage will be fair and focus on the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate's policies. However, we will always focus on media manipulation as we believe it to be extremely dangerous to both the democratic process and the ultimate safety of the country. When a Chavez or the Taliban can count on the New York Times as an ally in achieving it's objectives, it's obvious something is very wrong.

Bush and Chávez Spar at Distance Over Latin Visit

By JIM RUTENBERG and LARRY ROHTER
Published: March 10, 2007

SÃO PAULO, Brazil, March 9 — President Bush began the first full day of his weeklong trip to Latin America here on Friday promising job-creating aid but ended up competing for attention with President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, who called the American visit an act of imperialism, adding, “Gringo, go home!”

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/10/world/americas/10prexy.html?hp

Friday, March 9, 2007

Iran-Russia Talks in Failure

What amazes me here is not that Russia cares about the spread of nuclear materials or U.N. sanctions; they are pissed off about not getting paid. This is exactly how the world worked in Iraq for a decade under an ineffective U.N. and a corrupt international community. All of which seriously added to the Bush administration's decision to attack Iraq.

As Russia proves today, there is no such thing as allies. There are strategic alliances, just like in business.

Mar. 9, 2007 14:14
Iran-Russia talks end in failure
By
ASSOCIATED PRESS MOSCOW

Three days of talks aimed at resolving a funding dispute over the Russian-built Bushehr nuclear plant in Iran ended in failure Friday, signaling yet another delay in the start-up of Iran's first atomic power plant and potentially new tension between Tehran and Moscow.

With the UN nuclear watchdog agency imposing new punitive measures against Tehran, analysts said that Russia's tough stance shows Moscow's readiness to dump support for its ally and trading partner and join the United States and other Western nations in drafting new, tougher sanctions over Iran's uranium enrichment effort.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173173971307&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Krauthammer on the Libby Verdict

And so it goes, this thing of ours - and how nauseating and ultimately self-destructive. I can honestly say I do not know enough about the history of the case to offer a definitive opinion, but based on its coverage, it reeks of partisan politics.

The media in this country presents America's greatest challenge for survival the 21st century. The ultimate question is if the partisan politics will nullify our strengths to the point where America becomes second rate or vulnerable enough to be destroyed by those who hate us.

Fitzgerald's Folly
A Textbook Case for a Speedy Pardon
By
Charles Krauthammer Friday, March 9, 2007

There are lies and there are memory lapses. Bill Clinton
denied under oath having sex with Monica Lewinsky. Unless you're Wilt Chamberlain, sex is not the kind of thing you forget easily. Sandy Berger denied stuffing classified documents in his pants, an act not quite as elaborate as sex, but still involving a lot of muscle memory and unlikely to have been honestly forgotten.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/08/AR2007030801499.html

Chavez: So Predictable and Transparent...

Isn't it interesting to see thug/strongman Hugo Chavez so upset over the United States push into the energy plans for South America that he goes out of his way to stage protest rallies instead of embracing a strategy to better serve the South American continent. All of these bullsh-t artists are the same. They want power for themselves and their cronies. They are terribly threatened by the United States and they go to any extreme to point fingers and divert attention from facts.

If Chavez gave a damn about anything other than his own attempts at grabbing power, he would at least attempt to meet with the United States and work towards a bigger, better goal. Instead, following his circus act at the U.N. last year, he is making more of a fool out of himself by leading anti-U.S. marches.

Where are the members of our media supporting the president on this one? I know Ken Olbermann

Chavez countering Bush tour with 'cry of rebellion'
POSTED: 11:50 a.m. EST, March 9, 2007
CNN News

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (Reuters) -- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Friday attacked President Bush's anti-poverty and energy plans for Latin America as the two ideological opponents embarked on rival tours in the region.

"He's a symbol of domination, and we are a cry of rebellion against the domination. ... He's trying to trick our people to divide us," Chavez told reporters before he met with fellow leftist President Nestor Kirchner of Argentina.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/03/09/chavez.antibush.reut/index.html

New York Times would rather see Chavez succeed than George Bush

The New York Times has now evolved from a highly respected newspaper to a left wing op-ed publication to one that endangers the best interests of the United States. There is really no other way to interpreter the New York Times coverage of President Bush's South American tour to promote ethanol.

Every sane person must agree that it is in our best interests to find alternatives to oil usage. Brazil has been making a successful case for ethanol over the past few years. As President Bush attempts to promote the growth of ethanol usage and the alliances necessary for such an effort to develop, he can once again count on the New York Times and it;s influence to work against him.

The New York Times has decided upon a two-tiered strategy on coverage of this trip. The first is to make it read and appear as low level importance. The second is to force a negative spin on it, focusing on protesters positioning the U.S. again as acting as the imperial giant from the north come to manipulate and exploit the poor.

No where in the coverage does the New York Times detail that the protesters were mostly puppets of Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, who wants total control over the region for himself. The way the Times manages to position the article, the reader cannot help but come away questioning and actually rooting against their own government on perhaps the most crucial issue of the day.

I find it reckless, terribly wrong as well as working against the best interests of the U.S.

Visit by Bush Fires Up Latins’ Debate Over Socialism

By
JIM RUTENBERG and LARRY ROHTER
Published: March 9, 2007

SÃO PAULO,
Brazil, March 8 — President Bush has portrayed his trip to Latin America this week as a “We Care” tour aimed at dispelling perceptions that he has neglected his southern neighbors.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/world/americas/09latin.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Thursday, March 8, 2007

Victor Davis Hanson on Hypocrisy

Bipartisan Hypocrisy Libertines on all sides.
By Victor Davis Hanson

Recently, several conservative politicians, moralists, and evangelicals have been embroiled in scandal. As congressmen, Tom Delay and Duke Cunningham had publicized brushes with ethics laws, while their former colleague Mark Foley and Ted Haggard, who was pastor of a large evangelical church, were implicated in embarrassing sexual affairs.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MWJiMzg4NDYwNzU5ODAyOTljZDVjN2FlZjU3ZDk1NDk=

David Brooks Offers Some Significant Perspective

David Brooks presents us with an article that offers perspective and details of historical events as they played out during the Bush presidency. I am struck by just how scary those first years were, the terrible strain the administration was forced to work under and how many have turned their backs on that reality and simply blame today's events as if they were made in a vacuum.

Op-Ed Columnist
Yes, Those Were the Days
By DAVID BROOKS
Published: March 7, 2007

Three years ago I said some pessimistic things on TV about the war in Iraq. Scooter Libby called the next day. Methodically, though with a touch of wryness in his voice, he ran down a list of the hopeful developments he thought I was ignoring. Then as we were signing off, he interrupted himself and said: “Anyway, that’s the positive spin. I can do the negative spin just as well.”

http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/07/opinion/08brooks-sub.html

Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Tehran's Heroic Women.

Peter Tatchell of The Guardian asks the following question in an interesting piece for The Guardian. "Why does the Far Left Media in America ignore the Iranian Women's fight for democracy?"

Good question. Maybe because for the most part they are media driven, flock like sheep and really have little interest outside of bashing their own country, basic teenage behavior.

Tehran's heroic women
Despite violent repression, the Iranian women's movement is defiant.
Peter Tatchell, The Guardian

Why is much of the left and the liberal media ignoring the struggle for democracy and women's rights in Iran?

Tomorrrow - March 8 - is
International Women's Day and the women of Iran are growing bolder and more defiant than ever. Last Sunday, a group of courageous women's rights activists staged a vigil outside the Engelab Court in Tehran. They held banners demanding: "We have the right to hold peaceful protests".

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/peter_tatchell/2007/03/tehrans_heroic_women.html

Steyn : "They Care"

Author and columnist Mark Steyn offers insight gained on his book tour across the country. To expand his personal horizons (as well as combat boredom) he requests that his agent diversify his agenda by additionally booking him on the National Public Radio - Public Broadcast System tour. The attached article details his thoughts and experiences from this undertaking.

Steyn on America
KEEPING CALM
Tuesday, 06 March 2007

I have the most professional publishers I’ve ever had. Regnery, that is. They’re in the business of shifting product in large quantity, and to that end they’ve had me staggering from one radio or TV interview to another for months on end, plugging my book on the dangerously enfeebled state of western civilization. Mostly to the usual suspects, I have to admit: Fox, right-wing talk-radio, and so on. But a few weeks ago I suggested to my publicist that, much as I enjoyed taking calls that began, “Your book is the best book I’ve read in my entire adult life”, I wouldn’t mind doing a few shows from the other side, down the NPR-PBS end of things.

http://www.steynonline.com/content/blogcategory/13/99/

Thomas Friedman: A Well Traveled 14 Year Old...

I was once one of Thomas Friedman's biggest fans. In the year's following 9-11, I feverishly awaited the publication of each of his columns, my thirst insatiable. Tom offered a unique, first-hand crash course on the hornet's nest that rocked my world and I wanted to study all of it.
After a few years, I was struck with a revelation; while I still found his observations interesting, a rub developed over how he interpreted his data. I experienced a similiar sensation while trying to reread Ayn Rand fifteen years after college. I found the author's philosphy didn't connect with me on the same level.

It was then I realized Tom was reminding me of an idealistic, naive and slightly spoiled teenager. While I still liked his first-hand experience, I now had to filter his interpretations. In essence, I had outgrown him.

Tom lives a charmed life. He enjoys a Cart Blanche position with the ultra -liberal New York Times. He travels where ever he choses and covers whatever he likes. Today he is a best-selling author. Television's chattering classes are practically in awe of him. He has had a hell of a run but has one significant problem; Thomas Friedman is too close to his subject matter, while too far removed from everyday reality. As a result has lost his perspective. This is clearly apparent in the positions he takes, the fingers he points and the anger he expresses.

Tom's criticism of the Bush Administration runs along two themes. The first is that they tried to do the Iraq War "on the cheap." The second is that they sold the war to the American people as another Grenada (translation: easy win) . Both are flawed and incorrect.

I have never once read a column where Tom called out all of those in the media who have sabotaged the administration and it's ability to lead this war. If Tom exposed how the Administration had to walk on eggshells to satisfy a mostly spoiled, unrealistic public that is used to victimless, video game wars like Gulf 1 and Bosnia, I would have more respect for him but he never has. In true Monday morning quarterback style, he simply blames the administration as if they govern in a vacuum.

Tom's claim that the Bush Administration tried to sell America an easy war is simply delusional. The president has said publicly, time and again, that the war will be long, costly and painful. Here Tom is simply flat (as in the world is) out wrong.

I believe there is still much to gain from reading Tom Friedman. However, I think it is time Tom took a step back and analyzed the origins of his anger. Perhaps he has spent so much time in the Middle East and placed so much hope on a war he strongly supported that his disappointment has been inappropriately focused on his government, much like a spoiled teenager blaming his parents.

Don’t Ask, Don’t Know, Don’t Help
By
THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Published: March 7, 2007

I haven’t kept count, but it seems to me that the number of times I’ve seen President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney give speeches about the Iraq war using smiling soldiers as their backdrops have been, well, countless. You’d think that an administration that has been so quick to exploit soldiers as props — whether it was to declare “Mission Accomplished” on an naval vessel or to silence critics by saying their words might endanger soldiers in battle — would have been equally quick to spare no expense in caring for those injured in the fight.

http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/07/opinion/07friedman.html

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Kristof on Obama: Perfect Example of Dreaming

In today's Op-Ed section Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times writes idealistically of how Barack Obama's childhood experiences living abroad, having some first hand Muslim education and growing up poor, single him out as a unique and possibly better-suited candidate for the presidency than many others in recent history. I appreciate the points that Mr. Kristof is trying to make. However as a whole, I disagree with him.

None of Obama's experiences make up for his exceptional lack of experience as a politician and a leader. It is one thing to embrace and enjoy one's Muslim heritage. It is another to confront and deal with a Taliban playing cat and mouse with Pakistan nuclear weapons - a strong man's heartbeat away. The initial warm and fuzzy reaction he is receiving from many will fade when he is confronted with an iron-fisted Putin or a super-powerful and growing China pursuing it's own agenda.

While Kristof's silver spoon analogy is obviously yet another swipe at President Bush (what would a New York Times Op-Ed piece be without one?) he leaves out some facts. Bill Clinton was not born with a silver spoon nor were Jimmy Carter, Richard Nixon or Ronald Regan. Needless to say those listed above had various degrees of success (depending on whom you speak to). Growing up poor guarantees nothing in the Oval Office.

I am not ruling out Obama by any means. I have written here time and again that his gifts are tremendous. In today's media age the most important skill for a leader is to be able to communicate with his masses, George Bush's greatest weakness. In addition, Obama will learn over time and become more and more formidable. I would not be surprised to see him defeat Hillary. Her requiring Bill this early is a terrible sign. She is rapidly becoming a lose/lose no matter what she does.

Obama can very well win his party's nomination. I just think we cannot overlook the fact that he must seriously up his game and not sit back on idealistic laurels.

Obama: Man of the World
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: March 6, 2007
WASHINGTON

The conventional wisdom about Barack Obama is that he’s smart and charismatic but so inexperienced that we should feel jittery about him in the Oval Office. But that view is myopic. In some respects, Mr. Obama is far more experienced than other presidential candidates.

http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/opinion/06kristof.html

BBC Poll - Iran, Israel Top Negative List, US is 6th

No surprise with Isarel at number one (what else is new?), however the big surprise is that the U.S. is down to number six (6), amazing considering the American left hates it the most.

Israel, Iran top 'negative list'
By Nick Childs
BBC world affairs correspondent

A majority of people believe that Israel and Iran have a mainly negative influence in the world, a poll for the BBC World Service suggests.

It shows that the two countries are closely followed by the United States and North Korea.

The poll asked 28,000 people in 27 countries to rate a dozen countries plus the EU in terms of whether they have a positive or negative influence.

Canada, Japan and the EU are viewed most positively in the survey.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6421597.stm

Sunday, March 4, 2007

Fascinating BBC Reporter's Documentary on Iran

I have attached a link to a very interesting documentary produced by the BBC on Iran. It focuses on the actual day to day lives of regular Iranians. To what degree this is 100% authentic or if it has sensorship, I do not know. What I do know is that it offers a lot more than I have seen before and I found it well worth watching.

It is long, so enjoy as much as you like.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4679426685869498072&q=iran+%2Bdocumentary+%2BBBC

Amotz Asa-El Call All Out on the Carpet

In an extremely sobering article, Asa-El makes a point of detailing the seriousness of Iran's nuclear threats to Israel and the hypocrisy Israel faces on a consistent basis. When he calls out "How many of Israel's highbrow critics are prepared to scold Iran with the kind of vitriol, admonition and moralism to which they so habitually resort when it comes to Israel?" You do have to admit he has a serious point. When he asks "What is Norwegian Finance Minister Kristin Halvorsen - who last year called on her countrymen to boycott Israeli products - now doing to face up to Iran?" Again you are forced to contemplate the facts. When he declares "Maybe it's all for the best that such ostensible anti-Zionists now get exposed for what they really are: anti-Semites." You know he is right, but it does not make the situation any better.

It's a shame that most to this day cannot define anti-semitism for exactly what it is.

Mar. 1, 2007 13:18 Updated Mar. 2, 2007 22:25
Middle Israel: Nuclear perspectives (II): The moral instinct
By
AMOTZ ASA-EL, The Jerusalem Post

The atom bomb emerged as an improbable result of fascism's assault on the Jews - the modern version of Cain's attack on Abel.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1171894548996&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Iran Denies Saudi Report to Support Peace Plan

Hopefully the meeting between the Sunni and Shite lynch pins accomplished far more than this misconception. Having an Iran sign on would offer tremendous significance to such a strategic compromise.

Iran denies Saudi report it supports Arab peace plan
By Haaretz Staff and the Associated Press

A spokesman for the Iranian presidency on Sunday denied that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had expressed support for the 2002 Arab peace initiative during talks with Saudi officials, as reported by Saudi Arabia's official news agency."During the summit, no discussions were held in this regard," Spokesman Ehsan Jahandideh told IRNA, the Iranian news agency.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/832998.html

The Real Hillary Clinton - David Geffen Split

It would appear that David Geffen's attack on Hillary Clinton last week was personally motivated over baggage from Bill's final days in office. Doesn't that make you feel like Geffen and his cohorts are utilizing their huge financial resources and cultural influence for the country's best interests? With all their far-left posturing you would hope they have a degree of integrity to go along with their off-the-chart perceptions. To hear their political selections are motivated by petty personal vendettas is very disturbing if true. I hope this is not the case.

Geffen, Clinton were often at odds
The billionaire shocked many when he criticized the former first lady. But his friendship with the former president was rocky.
By Stephen Braun and Dan Morain, L.A. Times Staff Writers, March 4, 2007

WASHINGTON — Long before the fractious public airing of their poisoned relations, the political friendship between David Geffen and Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton was an unconventional alliance with a cloudy future.The outspoken Hollywood mogul Geffen lavished nearly $1.2 million on the Clintons and other Democrats during the Clinton White House years, gaining extraordinary access to the president while hosting the couple at intimate dinners at his Malibu beachfront home and sleepovers at his estate in Beverly Hills.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-geffenclinton4mar04,0,2722966.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Iran and Saudi Arabia Pledge Peace between Sunnis and Shias

Man would I like to know what went on in that room? You have the world's largest Sunni and Shite financiers actually sitting down for a pow-wow. Take away the first few hours of blaming America for everything and eventually the two dictators must have actually gotten around to actual business. It will be interesting to see what comes of it. I honestly do not know to what degree they can manage the genies they have let out of their bottles.

Iran and Saudi pledge friendship
The leaders of Iran and Saudi Arabia have agreed to fight the spread of sectarian strife between Sunnis and Shias in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East.

Saudi's King Abdullah and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad also discussed the war in Iraq in their first ever face-to-face meeting on Saturday.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D4EEF783-C1CE-467F-824C-DD67943B2255.htm

Gore: The Ultimate Limousine Liberal (Part II)

I understand the "do as I say not as I do" mantra. It's not new. However, it's a bit tough to let this one go. Didn't Gore think that this might get out one day?

Here we have a former public servant, a man of the people, preaching about energy conservation as he lives in a 10,000 square foot mansion and utilizes more energy on a monthly basis than the average American does in a year.

Wow. Don't count on him entering the race as a late sleeper after this. Not even if he loses thirty pounds.

GORE THE GUZZLER

March 1, 2007 -- How big is Al Gore's carbon footprint?
Pretty hefty.

Gore grabbed an Oscar Sunday night for his global-warming horror flick, "An Inconvenient Truth" - and took the opportunity to lecture America about its duty to Go Green and stay there.
Now a Tennessee think tank has revealed an inconvenient truth of its own - about what Gore actually practices, as opposed to what he endlessly preaches.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03012007/postopinion/editorials/gore_the_guzzler_editorials_.htm

Democrats Message Sends Message of Weakness to Musharraf

MESSAGES FOR MUSHARRAF

March 4, 2007 -- As part of his recent tour to the lands of America's allies in the War on Terror, Vice President Dick Cheney reportedly conveyed a tough message to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf.
The gist: Aid to Pakistan could be jeopardized if the nation doesn't step up efforts to stem the flow of Taliban and al Qaeda fighters into Afghanistan.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03042007/postopinion/editorials/messages_for_musharraf_editorials_.htm

Saturday, March 3, 2007

Victor Davis Hanson: Anatomy of Iraq

03/02/07

Victor Davis Hanson delivers a brilliant article that catalogues the events of the Iraq War as they unfolded, the shape shifting of the self-serving political servants of our government, how the far left media's agenda empowers our enemies and that all is not lost.

A sensational, historically accurate memorization.

March 2, 2007 8:10 AM

Anatomy of Iraq
How did we get to this baffling scenario?
By Victor Davis Hanson

It’s make it or break it in Iraq in 2007. Or so we are told, as America nears four years of costly efforts in Iraq. But how did we get to this situation, to this fury over a war once supported by 70 percent of the public and a majority of Congress, but now orphaned by both?

How did a serious country, one that endured Antietam, sent a million doughboys to Europe in a mere year, survived Pearl Harbor, Monte Cassino, Anzio, the Bulge, Tarawa, Iwo and Okinawa, the Yalu, Choisun, Hue and Tet, come to the conclusion — between the news alerts about Britney Spears’ shaved head and fights over Anna Nicole Smith’s remains — that Iraq, in the words of historically minded Democratic senators, was the “worst” and the “greatest” “blunder,” “disaster,” and “catastrophe” in our “entire” history?

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjdkOTA2NmUxYzkwY2U4NzcyYTYwN2VhZDdmMTkxOWQ=

Ahmadinejad to Visit Saudi Arabia

03/02/07

Below you will find Al Jazeera's English coverage of the upcoming "Middle Eastern Superbowl" as Iran's Ahmadinejad (King of all Shites) meets with Saudi Arabia's (King of all Sunnis) ruling monarchy this week.

Who knows what will really be going on behind closed palace doors, but once they both stop blaming George Bush they will have to address the mess they have on their hands and how to calm it down. Otherwise quite soon the most unstable region on the planet, which controls the most precious natural resource, will be deep into the nuclear arms race that will eventually vaporize all watering holes.

Let's hope the Saudis and the Iranian love their children too. (Sting)

Ahmadinejad due in Saudi Arabia
Al Jazeera News Coverage

Iran's president is set to make his first official visit to Saudi Arabia amid developments that threaten to further isolate Tehran because of its refusal to suspend uranium enrichment.

Upon his arrival on Saturday, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is expected to hold talks with the Saudi monarch, King Abdullah.
bodyVariable350="Htmlphcontrol1_lblError";
Ahmadinejad's visit is aimed at calming sectarian tensions threatening the region as well as conflicts in Iraq and Lebanon.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/AED40568-768D-45EB-AFE2-3EBDF264CA21.htm

Abdullah: Best of the Worst with Same Old Song

03/02/07

You never know what is going on behind closed doors in the Middle East despite the English version we often get spoon fed in the media. We've all become hip to the Arafat; count on the language barrier, say one thing to the West in English and something else to the Arabs in Arabic. It managed to work a long time since most of the West was really concerned about making money and enjoying prosperity the rest of the planet can only dream of. Of course 9-11 changed our degree of concern and awareness, at least for a while.

Jordanian King Abdullah II has always appeared to be the most reasonable, level-headed and sincere of the iron-fisted, ruthless, exceptionally wealthy Arab dictators when dealing with the West. Perhaps he has to because as one of the regions weakest rulers, his might be the first kingdom to fall if things get too out of hand. Like I said, who knows? I rarely get an opportunity to read what he says in his Al Jazeera interviews and I haven't been invited to one of his palaces for a twelve course dinner in a while.

When the King makes comments like the ones printed below, we all know it is part of a chess match, a royal agenda. To say the entire Middle East hornet's nest is the result of the Israeli/Palestinian crisis is absurd. This is not a bad sign because it signals that the region's royal hierchy knows they have serious problems and their best way to stay in power is to appear to be sincerely addressing "the Israeli Issue."

Their problem is that the Israeli crisis has nothing to do with the Sunni's and the Shites. It has nothing to do with the repercussions of non-secular countries with thirteenth century philosophy's waking up and discovering their subjects are really pissed off with third world life. It has everything to do with no employment opportunities, but the availability of tons of finger pointing mosques. It has everything to do with the decades old practice of self-serving governments diffusing blame from their gluttony and deflecting rage to the Palestinian crisis, which they have kept in perpetual limbo as a trump card for that exact purpose.

To once again say that Israel must return to prewar borders (which war?), giving up lands it captured after being attacked, exposing itself to even greater potential harm to achieve a peace no nation will guarantee, when lunatics like Iran's president publically call for it's extermination, is asking Israel to risk self-destruction.

We have seen this game time and time again. I hope Abdullah and the rest of his contemporaries in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and company have a bigger vision with a shot at working. I believe they are seriously scared, realize they have created a monstrous series of problems that they are now being forced to face and will try to deal with them. I simply hope they have developed greater perspective in how to compromise.

Abdullah: US must influence Israel
By
ASSOCIATED PRESS AMMAN, Jordan


Jordan's King Abdullah II said Friday that Israel must choose between the mentality of "Israel the fortress" or "living in peace and security with its neighbors."

Interviewed on state television before his departure for the United States, the king said the United States was the country most capable of influencing Israel. "It is time that the [US] employ this influence to prove its transparency to the people of the region, and that it is not biased," Abdullah said.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1171894559202&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Bush and Brazil Promote Ethanol

03/02/07

In what one hopes to be a first and positive step to reduce Western Hemisphere dependency on Middle Eastern oil, President Bush is teaming up with Brazil to promote ethanol usage.

I have many thoughts and questions about this. This first thought is that anything that is realistic and that can decrease our dependence (hence involvement) on Middle Eastern oil is exceptionally positive from every angle. I have read a bit about Ethanol. I do not know how functional it is at this point. I would like to know more.

In addition, why is Bush pushing it in Latin America and the Caribbean but not the U.S.? I hope this is for real, sincere, has serious legs and is not simply a tactic to take steam away from Chavez's influence over that section of the world.

U.S. and Brazil Seek to Promote Ethanol in West

By
EDMUND L. ANDREWS and LARRY ROHTER
Published: March 3, 2007
WASHINGTON, March 2 — President Bush, hoping to reduce demand for oil in the Western Hemisphere, is preparing to finish an agreement with
Brazil next week to promote the production and use of ethanol throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, according to administration officials.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/03/business/worldbusiness/03ethanol.html?hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1172925641-H8lAATXCJt4GRSU6GqCnDQ

Friday, March 2, 2007

Obama blames U.S. for stronger Iran

Foreign policy expert Barack Obama, drawing from his extensive first-hand experience, offers criticism of the Bush administration's handling of Iraq and Iran.

Obama is so far off the chart that he does not even qualify as a Monday Morning Quarterback in my viewpoint. I think he has to lose his political virginity as a presidential candidate and actually engage a few confrontational audiences and press gatherings before he is taken seriously for anything he says.

He is flush with potential but has to start fleshing out his bones to graduate from curiosity to candidate.

Obama blames U.S. for stronger Iran
By DEANNA BELLANDI, Associated Press Writer

CHICAGO - Democrat presidential candidate Barack Obama on Friday blamed the Bush Administration failings in
Iraq for strengthening the strategic position of Iran, which he says must be stopped from acquiring nuclear weapons.

The Illinois senator said that means "direct engagement" with Iran similar to the meetings with the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070302/ap_on_el_pr/obama_mideast

Thomas Friedman: Semi - A Honest Blame Game

Thomas Friedman today writes about the inaction of the Muslim world and it's effect on the Middle East. Of course he first manages to throw stones at George Bush and Tony Blair, the only Western leaders with the balls to have taken career defining stands to try and do something or Putin for allowing murderous business to continue as usual but then again, that would put accountability on the section of the world he has championed for two decades.

Tom offers interesting insight but his blame of the administration for trying to do it on the cheap is old and thin. Maybe if he once added that the administration did what they thought was best as they were being fought tooth and nail every step of the way by a media out to destroy them by influencing public support, I'd have a little more respect for him. Instead he remains a very knowledgeable writer whom we can all read for profit once we filter through his naive, childish rants. Too many years with a New York Times charge account.

The Silence That Kills
By
THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Published: March 2, 2007

On Feb. 20, The A.P. reported from Afghanistan that a suicide attacker disguised as a health worker blew himself up near “a crowd of about 150 people who had gathered for a ribbon-cutting ceremony to open an emergency ward at the main government hospital in the city of Khost.” A few days later, at a Baghdad college, a female Sunni suicide bomber blew herself up amid students who were ready to sit for exams, killing 40 people.

http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/02/opinion/02friedman.html?_r=1&oref=slogin