Democrats Impose Ulgy Strategy that will Backfire

The behavior and the agenda driving Democratic presidential candidates to avoid any debates on the Fox Network reveals the far left media's agenda and it's backers influence on Democratic candidates. The George Soros/Move.org crowd and many of their website hit men are having a much larger influence on the candidates they sponsor than ever before. In an age where network news is becoming insignificant as most of the country gets it's news from cable networks, the leading democratic candidates Clinton, Obama and Edwards have twice refuse to appear on Fox Network, the only cable network that is not openly left leaning.

I personally find this development disturbing. It reeks of censorship. The left is trying to destroy any non-left network by not allowing their candidates to appear despite the fact that they cannot point to one instance where any of them have suffered personal attacks or been treaded unfairly n any debate forum. This comes after all the Republican candidates were willing to appear on far left MSNBC in a debate led by openly far left leaning Chris Mathews.

By coddling their candidates the left is doing a disservice to the country. It is obvious they are after power at any cost. This is why they did not stand on their principals by caving on the vote to continue to finance the Iraq War. They would rather be sluts and later be able to point fingers at the president if it fails. Of course they will at the same time do everything possible to make sure all public media spins remain highly negative. Now they choose to hide candidates from having possible flaws exposed, only allowing them to appear at friendly forums. After the transparent covers on Time (twice), Newsweek and New York Magazine over the past few months it is getting frightening. We are living in a scripted age of censorship.

However, like most far left driven strategies, it is highly flawed. The American people will not be so easily fooled and the left always eats their own. Somewhere along the way some attention greedy reporter will break ranks and expose the game. The result will be a cowardly denial and a continued breaking of the ranks exposing the futile originally intended agenda.

For Democrats, Debate on Fox Reveals Divide
By RAYMOND HERNANDEZ and JACQUES STEINBERG
Published: May 27, 2007

WASHINGTON, May 26 — Four years ago, the leaders of the Congressional Black Caucus began looking for a television outlet to co-sponsor and broadcast a presidential debate to address the concerns of minority voters

Only one news channel made an acceptable proposal, and an unlikely channel at that: Fox News, in what some Democrats viewed as an effort to associate itself with a group that could help it make good on its claim of presenting “fair and balanced” news coverage.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/washington/27fox.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin